Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Sophistic Business Process Modeling using Business Process Properties Evaluation System

M. Thirumaran, P. Dhavachelvan, D. Balraj

Abstract


Many organizations of the current decade use the Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) which is a standard for capturing business processes in the early phases of systems development. The mix of constructs found in BPMN makes it possible to create models with behavioral errors. Such errors are especially problematic at the levels of domain analysis and high-level systems design, because errors at these levels are among the hardest and most costly to correct. A methodology for monitoring the correctness and identification of the inherent properties of the process model is thus a desirable feature for modelling tools based on BPMN. Nevertheless, since prior studies have only examined issues related to semantic and functional model checking methods, there have been few researches that introduce and discuss the hidden properties and the behavioral relationships between the components of the model. In this paper, a robust architecture for business process property evaluation engine is proposed. This can be integrated with any Business Process Modeling framework to efficiently identify the isolated properties in the individual components of the model and visualize the runtime exceptions in the model. Evaluation of the proposed architecture with the help of the Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM) shows that using this property evaluation engine, a target system can be developed with less manpower, in less time, and with higher quality than previous methods. The property evaluation mechanism improves the earlier mode of business design and further recommends the business expert to convert the functionality into an optimized one. This is a new research dimension which paves way for the certainty of the easy maintenance and re-engineering of business processes in future.

Keywords


Business Process Modeling Notation, Business Process Property Evaluation Engine, Business Process Re-engineering.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Composition of executable business process models by combining business rules and process flows, Sunjae Lee, Tae-Young Kim, Dongwoo Kang, Kwangsoo Kim and Jae Yeol Lee. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 2007.

Integration of Web Services technology with business models within the total product design process for supplier selection, Jiachen Hou and Daizhong Su. Journal of Computers in Industry, 2006.

The impact of context-aware fisheye models on understanding business processes: An empirical study of data flow diagrams, Ozgur Turetken and David Schuff. Journal of Information & Management, 2007.

The Role of Visual Modeling and Model Transformations in Business-driven Development, Jana Koehler, Rainer Hauser, Jochen Kuster, Ksenia Ryndina, Jussi Vanhatalo and Michael Wahler. Journal of Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2008.

The CAP framework for business process modeling, Keith Thomas Phalp. Journal of Information and Software Technology, 1998.

What business process modelers can learn from programmers, Volker Gruhn and Ralf Laue. Journal of Science of Computer Programming, 2007.

Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: A representational analysis, Michael zur Muehlen and Marta Indulska. Journal of Information Systems, 2009.

Modeling non-functional requirements of business processes, Faisal Aburub, Mohammed Odeh and Ian Beeson. Journal of Information and Software Technology, 2007.

Visualising business processes, Paul Oude Luttighuis, Marc Lankhorst, Rob van de Wetering, Rene Bal and Harmen van den Berg. Journal of Computer Languages, 2001.

The IS risk analysis based on a business model, Bomil Suh and Ingoo Han. Journal of Information & Management, 2003.

Querying business processes with BP-QL, Catriel Beeri, Anat Eyal, Simon Kamenkovich and Tova Milo. Journal of Information Systems, 2008.

Business process reengineering for health-care system using multicriteria mathematical programming, N.K. Kwak and Chang W. Lee. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002.

Bass, Len; Klein, Mark; & Moreno, Gabriel.2001. "Applicability of General Scenarios to the Architecture Trade-off Analysis Method". Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/01.reports/01tr014.html.

Bass, L.; Clements, P.; & Kazman, R. Software Architecture in Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998.

Muhammad Ali Babar, Liming Zhu, Ross Jeffery, 2004” A Framework for Classifying and Comparing Software Architecture Evaluation Methods” Coference (ASWEC‟04), p.309-315.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36039/AA052010004

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.