Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Methodologies for Tumor Detection Algorithm as Suspicious Region from Mammogram Images Using SVM Classifier Technique

Dr.M. Siddappa, Ramesh M. Kagalkar, Dr.M.Z. Kurian

Abstract


This paper presents a tumor detection algorithm from mammogram. The proposed system focuses on the solution of two problems. One is how to detect tumors as suspicious regions with a very weak contrast to their background and another is how to extract features which categorize tumors. The tumor detection method follows the scheme of mammogram enhancement, the segmentation of the tumor area, the extraction of features from the segmented tumor area and the use of SVM classifier. The enhancement can be defined as conversion of the image quality to a better and more understandable level. The mammogram enhancement procedure includes filtering, top hat operation, DWT. Then the contrast stretching is used to increase the contrast of the image. The segmentation of mammogram images has been playing an important role to improve the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. The most common Segmentation method used is thresholding. The features are extracted from the segmented breast area. Next stage include, which classifies the regions using the SVM classifier. The method was tested on 75 mammographic images, from the mini-MIAS database. The methodology achieved a sensitivity of 88.75%.

Keywords


Computer Aided Diagnosis CAD, Computed Tomography CT, Support Vector Machine SVM and Discrete Wavelet Transform DWT.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baines CJ, McFarlane DV, Miller AB. The role of the reference radiologist: Estimates of inter observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national screening study. invest radiol 1990;25:971-6.

Wallis ,M,M.Walsh and j.lee,1991. A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. Clin. Radiol., 44:13-5.

EssamA. Rashed, Ismail A. Ismail, SherifI. Zaki,"Multi resolution mammogram analysis in multi level descomposition ".Pattern Recognition Letters, Science Direct, Elsevier, 2007, Vol.28, Pag.286-292.

Zung-NeinYu,Kuan-YueLi, Yu-KunHuang." Detection of microcalcifcation in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markovfeld model", Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2006, Elsevier, Vol.30, Pag163-173.

E.L.Thurfjell, K.A.Lernevall and A.A.Taube. “Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based independent double reading in a population-based 241244, 1994. interpretation of mammogram the new England Journal of medicine , vol. 331, no. 22, pp. 14931499, 1994.

R.A. Smith, "Epidemiology of breast cancer in a categorical course in physics, Technical Aspects of Breast Imaging, 2nd ed., RSNA publication, Oak Book, II, pp.21, 1993.

R. Peto, J. Boreham, M. Clarke, C. Davies., V. Beral, UK and USA Breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20-THE LANCET, Volume 355, Issue 9217,Page 1822, 20 May 2000.

Ranadhir Ghosh, Moumita Ghosh, John Yearwood, "A Modular Framework for Multi category feature selection in Digital mammography", In Proceedings of the 12th European Symposium On Artificial Neural Networks -180, 28-30 April 2004.

C. Cortes, V. N. Vapnik, “Support vector networks”, Machine learning Boston, vol.3, Pg.273-297, September 1995.

V. N. Vapnik, “An overview of statistical learning theory”, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks New York, Vol. 10, pg. 998-999, September 1999.

O. Chapelle, V. N. Venice, Y. Bengio, “Model selection for small sample regression”, Machine Learning Boston vol.48, pg. 9-23, July 2002.

Y. Liu, Y. F. Zhung, “FS_SFS: A novel feature selection method for support vector machines”, pattern recognition New York, vol.39, pg.1333-1345, December 2006.

N. Acir, “A support vector machine classifier algorithm based on a perturbation method and its application to ECG beat recognition systems” Expert systems with application New York, vol.31, pg. 150-158 July 2006.

Girosi f. Jones M. and Poqqio T., “Regularization theory and neural network architectures”, Neural computation Cambridge, vol.7, pg.217-269, July 1995.

Smola A. J., Scholkopf B., and Muller K. R., “The connection between regularization operators and support vector kernels”, Neural Networks New York, vol.11, pg 637-649, November 1998.

Méndez, A.J., Tahoces, P.G., Lado, M.J., Souto, M., Vidal, Computer-aided diagnosis: Automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms Physics, vol. 25, pp. 957-964, 1998.

M. Pandey, S.P. Singh, P.B. Behere, S.K. Roy, S. Singh and V.K. Shukla, Quality of Life In Patients With Early and Advanced Carcinoma of the Breast, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, pp: 2024, v.26, 2000.

C. Cortes, V. N. Vapnik, “Support vector networks”, Machine learning Boston, vol.3, Pg.273-297, September 1995.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.