Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Disk Compression Using Semantic Agent and Domain Relationship

K. Srihari, Dr. A. Chitra T. Rajan

Abstract


Relevance storing and searching are key to web search in determining how results are retrieved and ordered. As keyword-based search does not guarantee relevance in meanings,semantic search has attracted enormous and growing interest to improve the accuracy of relevance ranking. Recently heterogeneous semantic information such as thesauruses, semantic markups and social annotations has been adopted in search respectively for this purpose. However, although to integrate more semantics would logically generate better search results in respect of semantic relevance, such integrated semantic search mechanism is still in absence and to be researched. This paper proposes multi-agent based semantic search approach to integrate both files and heterogeneous semantics. Such integration is achieved through semantic relationship between files. This research helps us to reduce the size of the file while storing and the files are stored based on a certain relationship. These files are compressed. Similar types of files are stored in specific drive of the hard ware. With respect to the great volumes of distributed and dynamic web information, this multi-agent based approach not only guarantees efficiency and reliability of search, but also enables automatic and effective cooperation’s for semantic integration. Experiments show that the proposed approach can effectively integrate both keywords and heterogeneous semantics for web search. Search engines are useful tools in looking for information from the Internet. However,due to the difficulties of specifying appropriate queries and the problems of keyword-based similarity ranking presently encountered by search engines, general users are still not satisfied with the results retrieved. To remedy the above difficulties and problems, in this paper we present a multi-agent framework in which an interactive approach is proposed to iteratively collect a user's feedback from the pages he has identified. By analyzing the pages gathered, the system can then gradually formulate queries to efficiently describe the content a user is looking for. In our framework, the evolution strategies are employed to evolve critical feature words for concept modeling in query formulation. The experimental results show that the framework developed is efficient and useful to enhance the quality of web search, and the concept based semantic search can thus be achieved. This system,agent based web browser, resides on users' computers providing with effective advice to help them locate the relevant information required from their browsing experience to view www document accessing the Internet taking advantages of text formatting,hypertext links, images, sounds, motion, and other features. Agent based web browser, is compatible with modern web pages and effectiveness and efficiency technologies of the process, active security features and the fastest response times, thousands of free ways to personalize user's online experience, superior speed and performance and autonomous process, running in the background of the computer while the user is the one with absolute control over the browsing path. The new generation of browser will be smarter by working online and offline to facilitate the connections of using ideal AI agents to be communicative, capable and autonomous able to understand user's goals, preferences and constraints. And it must be able to act without the user being in control the whole time.


Keywords


Semantics, Ontology, OWL, RDF.

Full Text:

PDF

References


An agent based semantic search engine for scalable enterprise applications by andrea passadore,alberto grosso, proceedings ontose 2009.

Combining semantic search and ontology learning for incremental web ontology engineering by nesrine,hajer,henda ,proceedings wism 2009.

Relevance feedback between text and semantic search by harry www 2009

Improving search results with lightweight and semantic search by marian simko, maria bielikova www2009.

A relation based page rank algorithm for semantic web search engines by fabrizio lamberti,IEEE,Andrew sanna and Claudio demartini,member IEEE transactions and knowledge and data engineering , vol 21 no1 january 2009.

A conceptual architecture for semantic search engine Mudassar Ilyas, Q. Yang Zong Kai Adeel Talib, M. Dept. of Electron. & Information Eng., Huazhong Univ. of Sci. &Technol., Wuhan, China; Multitopic Conference, 2004. Proceedings of INMIC 2004. 8th International

Berners-Lee, T. and M. Fischetti, Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor,Harper, San Francisco, 1999.

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. “The Semantic Web,”Scientific American, May, 2001

Brickley, D and R.V. Guha, “Resource Description Framework (RDF)Model and Syntax Specification”, W3C Recommendation submitted 22 February 1999, http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/ (current May 2002).

Connolly, D, van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I, McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P., and Stein, L. DAML+OIL (March 2001) Reference Description, W3C Note 18 December 2001 (http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference).

Hendler, Jim, “Agents and the Semantic Web,” IEEE Intelligent Systems. March/April 2001 (Vol. 16, 2).

Horrocks, I. Et al – OilED, available on the WWW at http://img.cs.man.ac.uk/oil/

M. A. Musen, R. W. Fergerson, W. E. Grosso, N. F. Noy, M. Crubezy,& J. H. Gennari. “Component-Based Support for Building Knowledge-Acquisition Systems”. In Conference on Intelligent Information Processing (IIP 2000) of the International Federation for Information Processing World Computer Congress (WCC 2000),Beijing, 2000.

McGuinness, D. "Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments." Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Conceptual Structures Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000). Darmstadt, Germany. August 14-18, 2000.

K. Stoffel, M. Taylor, J. Hendler. “Efficient Management of Very Large Ontologies.” In Proceedings of American Association for Artificial Intelligence Conference (AAAI-97), AAAI/MIT Press 1997.

Y. Sure, M. Erdmann, J. Angele, S. Staab, R. Studer, D.Wenke. OntoEdit: “Collaborative Ontology Development for the SemanticWeb.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference - ISWC2002, Springer, LNCS. Baader, F., Horrocks, I.& Sattler, U. (2003).

Description Logics as Ontology Languages For the Semantic Web.Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer.Berendt B., Hotho A. & Stumme G (2002).

Towards Semantic Web Mining. Proceedings of First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Sardinia, Italy, June 9-12, 264-278.

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web.Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43.Bisson, G., Nedellec, C &,Canamero, L. (2000).

Designing clustering methods for ontology building - The Mo’K workbench. Proceedings of the ECAI Ontology Learning Workshop.Brickley, D. & Guha, R.V. (2003).RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.

L. A. Zadeh, and J. Kacprzyk, Fuzzy logic for the management of uncertainty, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1992.

T. R. Gruber, “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol.5, no.2, 1993, pp. 199-220.

Z. S. Xu, “Linguistic aggregation operators: an overview,” in: Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions: Representation, Aggregation and Models,H. Bustince et al., (eds.), Springer, 2008, pp. 163-181.

B. V. Aduna, “The SeRQL query language,” http://www.openrdf.org/doc/sesame/users/ch06.html#d0e1977, 2002.

P. Haase, J. Broekstra, A. Eberhart, and R. Volz, “A comparison of RDF query languages,” in: ISWC 2004, LNCS 3298, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 502–517.

T. Furche, B. Linse, F. Bry, D. Plexousakis, and G. Gottlob, “RDF querying: language constructs and evaluation methods compared,” in:Reasoning Web 2006, LNCS 4126, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 1–52.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.