Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Performance Evaluation of Combination of Gaussian NLFM and Rayleigh NLFM Signals

B. Leelaram Prakash, K. Raja Rajeswari

Abstract


Pulse compression achieved with un-weighted linear FM (LFM) suffers from relatively high autocorrelation function (ACF) side-lobes. Since the ACF is the inverse Fourier transform of the power spectrum, the ACF sidelobes could be reduced by shaping the signal according to one of the many sidelobe suppression techniques. The shaping is performed by changing the pulse amplitude along the time axis. In LFM instantaneous frequency is linearly related to time. Indeed, the resulting spectral shaping is very close to the desired spectrum. But it has a serious drawback. In a matched transmitter–receiver pair, it results in variable amplitude of the pulse transmitted. Variable amplitude requires linear power amplifiers which are less efficient than saturated power amplifiers. This problem can be alleviated by performing amplitude weighting only at the receiver. The resulting mismatch causes SNR loss. In linear FM the transmitter spends equal time at each frequency; hence the nearly uniform spectrum will result. Another method for shaping the spectrum is to deviate from the constant rate of frequency change and to spend more time at frequencies that need to be enhanced. This approach is termed as nonlinear FM (NLFM). In this paper an attempt is made to compare the performance of Gaussian NLFM, Rayleigh NLFM and the combination of both these NLFM signals with respect to their ambiguity plots and range resolution plots.


Keywords


Pulse Compression, LFM, NLFM, Ambiguity Plot and Range Resolution Plot

Full Text:

PDF

References


Collins, T., and P. Atkins, Non-linear frequency modulation chirp for active sonar, IEE Proceedings: Radar, Sonar and Navigation, vol. 146, no. 6, December 1999, pp. 312–316.

Cook, C. E., and M. Bernfeld, Radar Signals: An Introduction to Theory and Application, Academic Press, New York, 1967.

Johnston, J. A., and A. C. Fairhead, Waveform design and Doppler sensitivity analysis for nonlinear FM chirp pulses,” IEE Proceedings, vol. 133, pt. F, no. 2, April 1986, pp.163-175.

Price, R., Chebyshev low pulse compression sidelobes via a nonlinear FM, National Radio Science Meeting of URSI, Seattle, WA, June 18, 1979.

A. D. Waite, Sonar for Practicing Engineers John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England, 2002.

Bassem R. Mahafza, Radar Systems Analysis and Design Using MATLAB, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press Washington, D.C, 2000.

Nadav Levanon & Eli Mozeson, Radar Signals, John Wiley & Sons Inc..,Hoboken, NJ, 2004

B.Leelaram Prakash & K.Raja Rajeswari, Performance comparison between Gaussian NLFM and Rayleigh NLFM signals “IJEST Proceedings: Vol.3 No.7, July 2011, pp. 5907-5913.

Skolnik, M. I., Radar Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.

Byron M. Keel, Brief Summary of a Nonlinear Frequency Modulated Waveform, Georgia Tech Research Institute Technical Memorandum, July 17, 2002.

Brian Hendee Smith, “An analytic nonlinear approach to sidelobe reduction,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 10, pp. 1162-1168, Aug.2001.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.