Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

On-Demand Routing Protocols Performance Comparison in Wi-Fi Networks Based On Rainfall Intensity

N. Hariprasath, T. Jayaram, R. Prema

Abstract


During rainfall the information signal while transmission gets attenuated and the network performance is affected greatly in the regions where frequent rainfall occurs as they are prone to varying climatic conditions. Therefore in order to maintain a reliable communication the implementation of a MANET protocols during rainstorm or similar unfavorable environmental conditions should be paid great attention for the selection of routing protocols. The routing protocol must provide efficient and effective improvement in performance aspects such as total number of packets received, throughput, mean jitter and an end to end delay. This paper undergoes evaluation based study of MANET reactive/ on-demand routing protocols namely LANMAR, OSPFV2, ANODR and DYMO in Wi-Fi networks (IEEE802.11n). The behavior of routing protocols is simulated and evaluated using Exata 5.1 network simulator by varying the intensity level of rainfall from light rain (2mm/hr) to cloud burst (100 mm/hr) to predict rainfall efficient routing protocol which can render maximum throughput and minimum delay.

Keywords


Rainfall, LANMAR, OSPFV2 (Open Shortest Path First version 2), DYMO (Dynamic MANET On-demand), ANODR (Anonymous On-Demand Routing), WiFi(Wireless-Fidelity), Emulation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hoebeke J, Moerman I., Dhoedt B. and Demeester P., “An Overview of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: Applications and Challenges”, Published in Journal-Communications Network, Vol. 3, No. 3, Pp .60-66, 2005.

Sumathi, K., Kumar, K. S., Sathiyapriya, T., & Gowri, D. K. (2015). An investigation on the impact of weather modelling on various MANET routing protocols. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(15).

Rangarajan, J., & Baskaran, K. (2015). Evaluating the Impact of Weather Condition on MANET Routing Protocols. International Journal on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 7(3), 454.

Skordoulis D, Ni Q, Chen H-H, Stephens AP, Liu C, Jamalipour A (2008) IEEE 802.11n MAC frame aggregation mechanisms for next-generation high throughput WLANs. IEEE Wireless Communication 15(1):40–47.

IEEE 802.11n-2009- IEEE Standard for Information technology Local and metropolitan area networks Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput, 2009.

http://www.floodsite.net/juniorfloodsite/html/en/student/thingstoknow/hydrology/rainfallintensi ty .html

Sumathi, K., Kumar, K. S., Sathiyapriya, T., & Gowri, D. K. (2015). An investigation on the impact of weather modelling on various MANET routing protocols. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(15)

All India Rainfall: https://data.gov.in/catalog/all-india-area-weighted-monthly-seasonal-andannual-rainfall-mm

Shrivastava A., Chander N.,” Overview of Routing Protocols in MANET’s and Enhancements in Reactive Protocols“, 2005, http://cs.lamar.edu/faculty/disrael/COSC5100/Seminar.pdf.

Rangarajan, J., & Baskaran, K. (2015). Evaluating the Impact of Weather Condition on MANET Routing Protocols. International Journal on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 7(3), 454.

Jayakumar G. and Gopinath G., ―Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks Routing Protocols- A Review,‖ Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 3, No.8, pp. 574-582, 2007.

Dinesh Singh, Ashish K Maurya, and Anil K Sarje. 2011. Comparative performance analysis of LANMAR, LAR1, DYMO and ZRP routing protocols in MANET using Random Waypoint Mobility Model in 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology. IEEE, 62–66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICECTECH.2011.5942051

G. Pei, M. Gerla and X. Hong, ”LANMAR: Landmark Routing for Large Scale Wireless AdHoc Networks with Group Mobility,” in Proceedings of IEEE/ACM MobiHOC 2000, Boston, MA, Aug. 2000, pp. 11-18.

Chakeres, P., & Perkins, C. (2007). C.: Dynamic manet on-demand (dymo) routing. Work in progress. internet-draft, Internet Engineering Task Force (March 2010)

Aziz S. R. A., Endut N. A., Abdullah S. and Daud M. N. M., ―Performance evaluation of AODV, DSR and DYMO routing protocol in MANET‖, CSSR 08-09, 14 - 15 March 2009

Suresh Kumar, R K Rathy and Diwakar Pandey, ―Traffic pattern based performance comparison of two reactive routing protocols for ad hoc networks using NS@‖, © 2009 IEEE.

Jabbar, A., Rohrer, J. P., Oberthaler, A., Cetinkaya, E. K., Frost, V., & Sterbenz, J. P. (2009, April). Performance comparison of weather disruption-tolerant cross-layer routing algorithms. In INFOCOM 2009, IEEE (pp. 1143-1151). IEEE

Al-Zaidi, R., Woods, J., Al-Khalidi, M., Alheeti, K. M. A., & McDonald-Maier, K. (2017, May). Next generation marine data networks in an IoT environment. In Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC), 2017 Second International Conference on (pp. 50-55). IEEE.

Balamurugan.E, jagadeesan.A, (2018), ―Geographic Routing Resilient To Location Errors‖, International Journal Of Innovations In Scientific And Engineering Research (IJISER),5(3) (pp.2126).

Saleh, A. I., Abo-Al-Ez, K. M., & Abdullah, A. A. (2017). A Multi-Aware Query Driven (MAQD) routing protocol for mobile wireless sensor networks based on neuro-fuzzy inference. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 88, 72-98.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.