Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A Model Driven Approach for Software Systems Quality in Examination System

P. Kabilan, Dr. K. Iyakutti

Abstract


EGovernance is a way for Universities to use the new technologies to provide students with more convenient way to access University information and services. EGovernance provides tremendous opportunities to move forward in the 21st century with better quality, cost-effective University services and a better relationship between students and their affiliated Colleges. A Secure exam system is developed in .NET framework, to computerize all the examination processes, pre-examination data capturing, processing and declaring of results of all courses offered by the university including both under-graduate and post-graduate courses. The Developed software should have suitable security and integrity mechanism. Developers should impart training to officials of the University and Colleges for the optimum utilization of the software.E-Governance offers a new way forward, helping to improve University processes, connect Students and build interactions with and within a Student Community. Three basic change potentials for good governance for development are Automation, Informatisation and Transformation.


Keywords


Defect Prediction, Software Quality, Orthogonal Defect Classifications

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ram. Orthogonal Defect Classification www.chillarege.com/odc

Ram92. Adopting ODC to improve software quality: A case study Yang Gu, Software Engineer, IBM http://www.ibm.com

Brad01. How good is the Software: A Review of Defect Prediction Techniques Brad Clark, Dave Zubrow Carrnegie Mellon University.

Yang06. “Orthogonal Defect Classification – A Concept for In-Process Measurements”, Ram Chillarege, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 11, Nov 1992.

Koru,A.G and Tian.J. (2003).An empirical comparison and characterization of high defect and high complexity modules. Journal of System and Software.67(3):153-163.

Koru,A,G and Tian .J (2004). Defect handling in medium and large open source software projects. IEEE Software.21(4):54-61.

[Amezquita 96] “Orthogonal Defect Classification Applied to a Multidisciplinary Design”, A. Amezquita & D.P.Siewiorek, CMU EDRC 05-100-96.

[Bassin 98] “Evaluating Software Development Objectively”, K. Bassin,T. Kratschmer, P. Santhanam, IEEE Software, Vol 15, 1998.

[Butcher 02], “Improving software testing via ODC: Three case studies”,M. Butcher, H. Munro, T. Kratschmer, IBM Systems Journal, Vol 41,No. 1, 2002.

[Chillarege 92] “Orthogonal Defect Classification – A Concept for In-Process Measurements”, Ram Chillarege, Inderpal S. Bhandari, Jarir K.Chaar, Michael J. Halliday, Diane S. Moebus, Bonnie K. Ray, Man-Yuen Wong, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 11, Nov 1992.

[Chillarege 94] “Identifying Risk using ODC Based Growth Models”, R.Chillarege, S. Biyani, Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, IEEE, Monterey, California, pp 282-288, November 1994.

[Chillarege 95] “Software Triggers as a function of time - ODC on field faults”, Ram Chillarege and Kathryn A. Bassin, DCCA-5: Fifth IFIP Working Conference on Dependable Computing for Critical Applications, Sept 1995.

[Humphrey 89] “Managing the SoftwareProcess”, Watts S. Humphrey,Addison-Wesley 1989.

[Iyer 90] “Introduction Experimental Computer Science”, R. K. Iyer,IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol 16, No 2., 1990.

[Jones 98] “Estimating Software Costs”, T. Capers Jones, McGraw-Hill,1998.

[Levendel 91] “Reliability Analysis of Large Software Systems: Defect Data Modeling”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol 16,No. 2, 1990.

[Mullen 02] “Orthogonal Defect Classificiation at CISCO”, R. Mullen,D. Hsiao, Proceedings ASM Conference, 2002.

[Musa 99] “Software Reliability Engineering”, McGraw- Hill, 1999.[ODC Web] Orthogonal Defect Classification www.chillarege.com/odc www.research.ibm.com/softeng

Paulk 93] “Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, Mark C. Paulk, Bill Curtis, Mary Beth Chrissis, Charles V. Weber, Software Engineering Institute, 1993.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.