Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Personalized Cloud Storage for E-Mails

J. Venkata Subramanian, A. Pandian, R. Manikandan


There has been a wide variety of cloud storage services for the file access and sharing, but it has been cost-effective. That makes it as less utile. People are not willing to use it. But as in our project the cloud storage services is offered for the web services such as Gmail and Yahoo! Even for uncharged accounts, this makes people to use it in the highly basis. As e-mail has become the powerful communication in our modern world. We have to provide the basic needs of giving the more security in preventing their mails from being destroyed. So we provide a backup storage or cloud storage for every individual account to access client own mails with our project. We are using the POP3 mail service to retrieve the mails. It is the more secured path to be accessed. A personal storage system leveraging online email service infrastructures would also benefit service providers as it extends their access to valuable customer data in terms of both volumes and variety. The major objective of the project is we have to connect to the mail server with the desired login information. As we are allowing the access for two mail services such as Yahoo and Gmail. The mails which have been accessed in our account can be retrieved in our My Mailbox using the Cloud storage services. As we are forming the personal cloud storage for every e-mail account. It makes easier to retrieve the relevant mails. As the mails are retrieved from our services, it can also be restored to our individual account. This makes it efficient for our web services. The main concern in our project is that, whenever the users or clients have deleted or lost their mails in the main server, it can be viewed here. And we also restrict the spam messages to the inbox. We will only retrieve the relevant mails which is present in the E-mail services with the help of the POP3 protocol.


Cloud Storage, POP3 Protocol, Web Services.

Full Text:



“Jungle disk,”



Y. Lu, H. Mao, and J. Shen, “A distributed filesystem framework fortransparent accessing heterogeneous storage services,” in IPDPS ’09.Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2009, pp. 1–8.

A. Traeger, N. Joukov, J. Sipek, and E. Zadok, “Using free web storage for data backup,” in StorageSS ’06: Proceedings of the second ACM workshop on Storage security and survivability, New York, NY, USA, 2006.

M. Szeredi, “File system in user space,”,2006.

M. Zhou and A. J. Smith, “Analysis of personal computer workloads,”in MASCOTS ’99. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society,1999, p. 208.


D. Roselli, J. R. Lorch, and T. E. Anderson, “A comparison of file system workloads,” in ATEC ’00: Proceedings of the annual conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference. Berkeley, CA, USA: USENIX Association, 2000, pp. 4–4.

P. Leach, M. Mealling, and R. Salz, “A universally unique identifier (uuid) urn namespace,”, 2005.

M. Rosenblum and J. K. Ousterhout, “The design and implementation of a log-structured file system,” ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., vol. 10, no. 1,pp. 26–52, 1992.

L. B. Soares, O. Y. Krieger, and D. Da Silva, “Meta-data snapshotting: a simple mechanism for file system consistency,” in SNAPI ’03: Proceedings of the international workshop on Storage network architecture and parallel I/Os. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2003, pp. 41–52.

N. Agrawal, W. J. Bolosky, J. R. Douceur, and J. R. Lorch, “A five-year study of file-system metadata,” Trans. Storage, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 9, 2007.

D. Patterson, G. Gibson, and R. Katz, “A case for redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID),” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference, 1988.

“Google outages damage cloud credibility,”, 2009.

J. Katcher, “Postmark: A new file system benchmark,” Technical report TR3022. Network Appliance, October 1997.

“Iozone filesystem benchmark,”

“Linux battery life toolkit,”



B. Pawlowski, C. Juszczak, P. Staubach, C. Smith, D. Lebel, and D. Hitz, “Nfs version 3 - design and implementation,” in In Proceedings of the Summer USENIX Conference, 1994, pp. 137–152.

J. H. Howard, M. L. Kazar, S. G. Menees, D. A. Nichols, M. Satyanarayanan, R. N. Sidebotham, and M. J. West, “Scale and performance in a distributed file system,” ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 51–81, 1988.

M. Satyanarayanan, J. Kistler, and E. Siegel, “Coda: A resilient distributed file system,” in IEEE Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, 1987.

G. DeCandia, D. Hastorun, M. Jampani, G. Kakulapati, A. Lakshman, A. Pilchin, S. Sivasubramanian, P. Vosshall, and W. Vogels, “Dynamo: Amazon’s highly available key-value store,” in SOSP, 2007.

M. Demmer, B. Du, and E. Brewer, “Tierstore: a distributed filesystem for challenged networks in developing regions,” in FAST’08: Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies. Berkeley, CA, USA: USENIX Association, 2008, pp. 1–14.

A. Muthitacharoen, B. Chen, and D. Mazi`eres, “A low-bandwidth network file system,” in SOSP ’01. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2001, pp. 174–187.

S. Ghemawat, H. Gobioff, and S. Leung, “The Google file system,” in Proceedings of the 19th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 2003.

S. A. Weil, S. A. Brandt, E. L. Miller, D. D. E. Long, and C. Maltzahn, “Ceph: a scalable, high-performance distributed file system,” in OSDI ’06. Berkeley, CA, USA: USENIX Association, 2006, pp. 307–320.

F. Schmuck and R. Haskin, “GPFS: a shared-disk file system for large computing clusters,” in Proceedings of the First Conference on File and Storage Technologies, 2002.

J. Hartman and J. Ousterhout, “The Zebra striped network file system,” in Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1993.

P. Carns, W. L. III, R. Ross, and R. Thakur, “PVFS: A Parallel File System For Linux Clusters,” in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Linux Showcase and Conference, 2000


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.