Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

The Effect of Mobile Technology on Face-to-Face Interactions among Teachers

Sherryl M. Montalbo, Dennis G. Caballes

Abstract


The objective of this study is to investigate how the use of mobile technology devices affect the face-to-face interactions among college teachers. The research was carried out using researcher-made questionnaire distributed to 41 faculty members of Batangas State University. Statistical treatment of data include mean, t-test, ANOVA and and Pearson’s r. Results revealed that there is no significant difference in the frequency daily mobile technology device usage when grouped according to profile variables. Moreover, is an overall negative effect of mobile technology usage in doing daily tasks on the face-to-face interactions among teachers. Lastly, there is a negative correlation between the respondents’ mobile technology device usage and quality of face-to-face interactions based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient of -0.366 with a corresponding probability value of 0.019.


Keywords


Mobile Technology, Communication, Human Relations, Teachers.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Keyton, J. Case Studies for Organizational Communication: Understanding Communication Processes. New York, New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 2011

Razik, T. & Swanson, A. Human Relations: The Base of Educational Leadership. In Fundamental Concept of Educational Leadership (Vol. 5, pp. 103-156). Allyn & Bacon. 2010.

Lunenberg, F. C. Communication: The process barriers. Schooling , 1 (1), 2010

Keyton, J. Communication and Organizational Culture: A Key to Understanding Work Experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2011

Marr, B. Forbes. Retrieved May 18, 2019, from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/08/13/the-4th-industrial-revolution-is-here-are-you-ready/#5f344648628b, 2018

Derks, D., Duin, D., Tims, M., & Bakker, A.B., “Smartphone use and work-home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 155-177, 2015

Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. A., “Work-family boundary management styles in organizations a cross-level model,” Organizational Psychology Review, vol.2 no. 2, pp. 152-171, 2012

Cho, J., “Roles of smartphone app use in improving social capital and reducing social isolation,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vo. 18, no. 6, pp. 350-355, 2015

Abu-Naser. Effects of Mobile Technology on Human Relations. International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems , 1 (5), 110-125, 2017

Shellenbarger, S. (2013, May 28). The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved May 18, 2018, from The Wall Street Journal: www.wallstreetjournal.com

Turkle, S. Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, 2012

Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N., “Mobile communication and civil society: Linking patterns and places of use to engagement with others in public,” Human Communication Research, vol. 37, pp. 207-222, 2011

Adler, I. (2013, January 17). How our digital devices are affecting our personal relationships,” [Online]. Available: http://www.wbur.org/2013/01/17/digital-lives-i

Gapsiso, N. D. (2015), “Impact of the Internet on Teenagers' Face-to-Face Communication,” Journal of Studies in Social Sciences, 13 (2), 202-220.

Brandon, J. Inc. Retrieved May 18, 2019, from Inc: www.inc.com, 2017


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.