Email this article 
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Comparison of Intelligent Software Agent Scheme and Robust Broadcast Protocol Scheme for Collecting and Diffusing Data in VANET
Abstract
In Future vehicles are equipped with recognizing, computing and communication potentials. Different kind of devices such as OBU and AU in a vehicle will have to continuously reciprocate the available data with other vehicles on the movement patterns and provide cooperation to ensure safety and ease in VANET. Specific Data like hazardous situations (like collision), speed limit, curve speed warning ,work zone warning, accidents, lane-changing etc play a vital role for applications related to safety in Vehicular Ad hoc Network. Collecting and diffusing such types of data is challenging because of their delay sensitive nature. This paper compares a model based on intelligent software agent that execute forward (collect/cache and diffuse) and retrieve(collect/cache) operation on collected data based on data emergency and needfulness with the existing robust broadcast protocol scheme. Result of simulation shows that collection and diffusion of data using intelligent software agent scheme performs better than the robust broadcast protocol scheme in terms of bandwidth utilization, packet delivery ratio and latency.
Keywords
References
Caliskan, M., Mauve, M., Rech, B., & Luebke, A, “Collection of dedicated information in vehicular ad hoc networks,” In 12th World congress on intelligent transport systems. San Francisco, USA (pp. 1–12),2005.
Y. Qian and N. Moayeri. “Design of Secure and Application-Oriented VANETs”. In Vehicular Technology Conference, pages 2794–2799. VTC Spring 2008, IEEE, 2008.
Fubler, H., Moreno, T., Transier, M., Kruger, R., Hartenstein, H., & Effelsberg, W, “Studying vehicle movements on highways and their impact on ad-hoc connectivity,” In ACM international conference on mobileComputingandNetworking (MobiCom). Cologne, Germany (pp. 26–27),2005.
P. Samuel. Of Sticker Tags and 5.9 GHz. in ITS International, 2004.
K. Matheus, R. Morich, I. Paulus, C. Menig, A. Lübke, B. Rech, and W. Specks,“Car- to-Car Communication-Market Introduction and Success Factors,” in ITS 5th European Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, Jun 2005.
Elmar Schoch, Frank Kargl, Michael Weber, and Tim Leinmuller, “Communication Patterns in VANETs”. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46:119–125, Nov 2008.
Rainer Kroh, Antonio Kung, and Frank Kargl, “VANETs Security Requirements Final Version,” Technical report, Secure Vehicle Communication (Sevecom), Sep 2006. Available at http://www.sevecom.org/Pages/ProjectDocuments
Vehicle Safety Communications Project Task 3 Final Report. Technical report, The CAMP Vehicle Safety Communications Consortium, Mar 2005. Sponsored by U. S, Department of Transportation (USDOT). Available through National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161
Manvi, S., & Kakkasageri, “ Issues in mobile ad hoc networks for vehicular communication,” IETE Technical Review, 2008, 25(2), 59–72.
M. S. Kakkasageri, S. S. Manvi , and Jeremy Pitt, “Cognitive Agent Based Critical Information Gathering and Dissemination in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks,” Wireless Pers Commun (2013) 69:1107–1129.
Rao, A., & Georgeff, M, “Modeling agents within a BDI-architecture,” In International conferenceon principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR’91) (pp. 473–484),1991.
Pasquier, P., & Chaib-draa, B, “ Integrating social commitment-based communication in cognitive agent modeling,” International workshops on agent communication (AC 2005). Utrecht, Netherlands (pp. 76–92).
Foltyn, L., Tozicka, J., Rollo, M., Pechoucek, M., & Jisl, P, “ Reflective-cognitive architecture: from abstract concept to self-adapting agent,” In IEEE workshop on distributed intelligent systems:Collective intelligence and its applications. Prague, Czech Republic (pp. 326–334),2006.
Myers, K. L., & Yorke-Smith, N, “A cognitive framework for delegation to an assistive user agent,” In Fall symposium on mixed-initiative problem solving assistants. Arlington, USA (pp. 1–6),2005.
Balon, N., & Guo,” Increasing broadcast reliability in vehicular ad hoc networks”. In 3rdInternational workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET 2006). Los Angeles, USA (pp. 1–2).
Chuah, M., & Fu, F, “ Performance study of robust data transfer protocol for VANETS,” In 2nd International conference on mobile ad hoc and sensor networks. Hong Kong (pp. 123–135),2006.
Nadeem, T., Shankar, P., & Iftode, L, “ A comparative study of data dissemination models for VANETs,” In 3rd Annual international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems. San Jose, California, USA (pp. 1–10),2006.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.