Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Tissue Characterization in Prostatic Lesion Using Statistical Feature Analysis

R.J. Hemalatha, G. Mohandass, G. Hari Krishnan, G. Umashankar

Abstract


The early detection of prostate cancer plays a significant role in the success of treatment and outcome. Trans Rectal Ultra-Sound (TRUS) is one of the most common non invasive diagnostic imaging method enable objective judgments by making use of quantitative measures. In this paper, we present a novel approach to statistically characterize the prostate tissue into different regions as malignant, prostatic calculi, presence of cyst, normal prostate. The characterization of the tissue involves two parts. The first part is to, automatically, segment the prostate gland and to detect the regions, which might be cancerous, for biopsies. The second part is to extract the ROI and to characterize the regions as malignant based on the statistical features obtained from the histogram of the prostate images. After the characterization the performance of this method is estimated by comparing the statistical parameters such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy with the biopsy result.


Keywords


Prostate, Statistical Analysis and Biopsy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. Ferlay, P. Autier, M. Boniol,M. Heanue,M. Colombet, and P. Boyle, “Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006,” Ann. Oncol., vol. 18, pp. 581–592, 2007.

A. Jemal,R. Siegel,E.Ward, Y.Hao, J.Xu,T.Murray, andM. J.Thun,“Cancer statistics, 2008,” CA Cancer J. Clin., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 71–96,2008.

M. Norberg et al., “The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer,” Urology, vol. 50, pp. 562-566, 1997.

Narayan, P., et al., 1995. The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided based-staging, preoperative prostate serum antigen and biopsy Gleason score in prediction of final pathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology 46 (2), 205–212.

F. H. Schröder, J.Hugosson,M. J.Roobol, T. L. J.Tammela, S.Ciatto,V. Nelen, M. K wiatkowski , M. Lujan, H. Lilja, M. Zappa, L. J. Denis,F. Recker, A. Berenguer, L. Määttänen, C. H. Bangma, G. Aus, A.Villers, X. Rebillard, T. van der Kwast, B. G. Blijenberg, S. M. Moss,H. J. de Koning, and A. Auvinen, “Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 360, no.13, pp. 1320–1328, 2009.

M. Moradi et al., “Computer-aided diagnoses of prostate cancer with emphasis on ultrasound- based approaches: A review,” Ultras. Med. Biol., vol. 33(7), pp. 1010-1028, 2007.

Lee F, Littrup PJ, Torp-Pedersen ST, et al: Prostate cancer: Comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening. Radiology 168:389-394, 1988.

Watanabe H, Kaiho H, Tanaka M, et al: Diagnostic application of ultrasonotomography to the prostate .Invest Urol 8:548-514, 1997.

McNeal JE: Regional morphology and pathology of the prostate. Am J Clin Pathol 49:347-357, 1968.

Tillman, L., et al., 2004. Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: random sextant versus biopsies of sonomorphologically suspicious lesions. World Journal of Urology 22 (5), 357–360.

Lee F, Gray JM, Mcleary RD. et al: Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Location, echogenicity, histopathology, and staging. Prostate 7:117-129, 1985.

Lee F, Torp-Pedersen ST, Littrup PJ, et al: Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: Clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen. Radiology170:29-32, 1989.

J.E. McNeal et al., “Zonal distribution of prostate adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread,” Am. J. Surg. Path., vol. pp. 897-906, 1988.

P. Perona, J. Malik, Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE PAMI, Vol. 7, No.12, 1990, pp. 629-639

H. M. Ladak, F. Mao, Y. Wang, D. B. Downey, D. A. Steinman, and A. Fenster, "Prostate Boundary Segmentation from 2D Ultrasound Images," Medical Physics,vol. 27, no. 8, August 2000, pp. 1777-1788.

S. Lobregt and M. A. Viergever, "A Discrete Dynamic Contour Model," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 14, no. 1, March 1995, pp. 12-24.

SOBEL, I., An Isotropic 3×3 Gradient Operator, Machine Vision for Three – Dimensional Scenes, Freeman, H., Academic Pres, NY, 376- 379, 1990.

Chitrakala, S. Shamini, P. and Manjula, D: Multi-class Enhanced Image Mining of Heterogeneous Textual Images Using Multiple Image Features”, Advance Computing Conference, 2009. IACC 2009. IEEE International, 2009, Page(s): 496 – 501.

L. A. Eskew, R. L. Bare, and D. L. Mccullough, "Systematic 5 Region Prostate Biopsy is Superior to Sextant Method for Diagnosing Carcinoma of the Prostate," Journal of Urology, vol. 157, January 1997, pp. 199-203.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.