Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Comparison of Analog and Discrete Hopfield Neural Network for Image Change Detection

D. Beulah David, B. V. Krishna

Abstract


This paper proposes an analog Hopfield neural network (HNN) for automatic image change detection problem between two images. This optimization relaxation approach differs from other techniques in that it provides the strength of the change rather than assigning binary labels (changed / unchanged) to each pixel. A difference image is obtained by subtracting pixel by pixel both images. The network topology is built so that each pixel in the difference image is a node in the network. Each node is characterized by its state, which determines if a pixel has changed or unchanged. An energy function is derived, so that the network converges to stable state. The main drawback of existing binary labeling approaches is that pixels are labeled according to the information supplied by its neighbors, where its self information is ignored. The main contribution of the analog Hopfield’s model is that it allows a tradeoff between the influence of a pixel’s neighborhood and its own criterion. This is mapped under the energy function to be minimized. Also a comparison between analog and discrete HNN shows similar Percentage of Correct Classification and Yule values. However, the analog counterpart describes the degree of change by embedding both Spatial-Contextual Information and Self-Data Information.


Keywords


Hopfield neural network (HNN,Spatial-Contextual Information and Self-Data Information.

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. J. Radke, S. Andra, O. Al-Kofahi, and B. Roysam, “Image change detection algorithms: A systematic survey,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 294–307, Mar. 2005.

M. Valera and S. A. Velastin, “Intelligent distributed surveillance systems: A review,” Proc. IEEE Vis. Image Signal Process., vol. 152, no. 2,pp. 192–204, 2005.

P. L. Rosin and E. Ioannidis, “Evaluation of global image thresholding for change detection,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 24, pp. 2345–2356, 2003.

C. C. Chang, T. L. Chia, and C. K. Yang, “Modified temporal difference method for change detection,” Opt. Eng., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2005.

T. Lu and P. N. Suganthan, “An accumulation algorithm for video shot boundary detection,” Multimedia Tools Applicat., vol. 22, pp. 89–106, 2004.

C. Y. Fang, S. W. Cheng, and C. S. Fuh, “Automatic change detection of driving environments in a vision-based driver assistance system,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 646–657, May 2003.

E. Stringa and C. S. Regazzoni, “Real-time video shot detection for scene surveillance applications,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 69–79, Jan. 2000.

L. Bruzzone and D. Fernández Prieto, “Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1171–1182, Mar. 2000.

E. Durucan and T. Ebrahimi, “Change detection and background extraction by linear algebra,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 1368–1381, Oct. 2001.

M. J. Carlotto, “A cluster-based approach for detecting man-made objects and changes in imagery,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 374–387, Feb. 2005.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.